Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: RBNW....new and improved! Date: Oct 20, 2010 9:59am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: the walrus was paul

http://www.spinner.com/2009/09/01/which-beatle-are-you/

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: fenario80 Date: Oct 20, 2010 10:46am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

I'm not taking that quiz: of course I would love to be John but would probably end up Pete Best.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: SomeDarkHollow Date: Oct 20, 2010 11:14am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

Better than Yoko.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: RBNW....new and improved! Date: Oct 20, 2010 11:38am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

oh-no

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Mandojammer Date: Oct 20, 2010 12:06pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

Outstanding

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: AltheaRose Date: Oct 20, 2010 8:58pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

Why? Why not? Why? Why not?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: clementinescaboose Date: Oct 20, 2010 11:07pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

i'm a little Paul and a little George - hey at least i'm not Ringo!

i'll take Paul, i think he gets a bad rap sometimes...

This post was modified by clementinescaboose on 2010-10-21 06:07:38

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: user unknown Date: Oct 20, 2010 3:40pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

It seems I am the illegitimate son of Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: bluedevil Date: Oct 20, 2010 3:58pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

I of John and Ringo.

I really wanted to be Stu Sutcliffe (or maybe even Klaus Voorman)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: elbow1126 Date: Oct 20, 2010 12:24pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

Ringo. Although i wanted to answer "none of the above" on most of the questions so maybe i will stick with listening to the Beatles instead of trying to be one.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ringolevio Date: Oct 20, 2010 12:43pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

I came out a little bit George, a little bit John. (Not a trace of Ringo, or whatever that other guy's name is.)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: elbow1126 Date: Oct 20, 2010 12:45pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

a little bit George and a little bit John? That sounds a lot bit dead.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: ringolevio Date: Oct 20, 2010 1:05pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

Well, I don't have cancer (didn't George die of cancer?) and there's probably nobody who wants to shoot me, so I hope I'm all right.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: lobster12 Date: Oct 20, 2010 4:15pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

anyone remember the SNL skit with Eddie Murphy as Clarance the 5th Beatle? he played Sax. He played one of the beatles tunes backwards and it said, "he John, let's kick Clarance out of the band and steal all of his good ideas."

just found it

http://beatlestweets.posterous.com/eddy-murphy-was-the-5th-beatle

This post was modified by lobster12 on 2010-10-20 23:15:05

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: TOOTMO Date: Oct 20, 2010 2:00pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

I tied between John and Paul. So, I'm the greatest songwriting duo rolled into one human body or effin schizo---you choose.

TOOTMO

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: amosearle Date: Oct 20, 2010 4:06pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

John and Paul. I'll take John, thanks.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Oct 20, 2010 7:01pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: WTF?

I got John?

And I also misunderstood!

This post was modified by William Tell on 2010-10-21 02:01:32

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Jack o' Roses Date: Oct 20, 2010 5:21pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

"Congratulations?"
I gotta go to the John...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: whirlwind dreamer 65-95 Date: Oct 20, 2010 10:20am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

i was john.lol!!~

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: AltheaRose Date: Oct 20, 2010 8:54pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

Hah. I'm almost equal parts all of them. That makes me The Beatles.

But I came out as slightly More Johnish. So that must make me John With the Beatles, which is certainly the artistic peak. Does that mean I win?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: unclejohn52 Date: Oct 21, 2010 10:53am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

You Win Again...

Actually, I think you win the prized chiffarobe for most entertaining and best written post of the week - The Dead Weren't Splenda.

Reply to this post
Reply

Poster: 70 blues skadoo Date: Oct 20, 2010 12:24pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: the walrus was paul

i was george. i can dig that.